Wednesday, July 9, 2014

This could be the end of public services, westminster mall water, education or health, the end of a


This is a trade agreement that nobody talks about, negotiated in the total opacity. 50 countries, among the most fervent advocates of liberalization, are currently discussing the opening of "market services" in international westminster mall competition. Education, health, transport, telecommunications, financial services ... Everything is on the table. Without citizens or parliamentarians have their say. Negotiators - subject to strong pressure from lobbies - are in Geneva this week for the 7th round of the international talks, which could seriously threaten public services and attempts to regulate the financial sector. Investigation.
This could be the end of public services, westminster mall water, education or health, the end of any attempt to regulate the financial markets or to protect westminster mall citizens' data. In short, never seen an obstacle to the exercise of democracy and the functioning of public policy. The Agreement on Trade in Services (ACS) or Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) is currently being negotiated between fifty countries [1], including those of the European Union. It was launched by the United States westminster mall and offered to member countries of the World Trade Organization westminster mall (WTO), called the group "Real good friends (services)" (Really Good Friends). "Soothe the frustration of business"
These negotiations take place outside the WTO, with the most supporters of the liberalization of services country contraries by the impasse of the Doha negotiations launched in 2001. [2] These countries represent more than two thirds of world trade in services. Many areas are affected: education, transport, post and telecommunications services, accounting and auditing, engineering and logistics, healthcare, insurance, technology and data transfer, research, banking and financial services ... Purpose: open yet more services to international competition and prevent any public intervention.
"These negotiations are the most promising in two decades to promote trade services to international opportunity," enthuses the lobby of the services industry in the United States. The International Coalition of Service Industries (GSC), which includes the MEDEF, is even more explicit: this agreement was designed "to soothe the frustration of business because of the impasse in the Doha Round in services" she wrote. [3] Prohibit any State intervention
"This is an attempt to secretly extend the worst of the infamous GATS agreement that sparked in the past global protests aspects," replied Rosa Pavanelli, westminster mall general secretary of the Public westminster mall Services International (PSI) . According to this organization, which brings together sector unions and represents 20 million workers, the ACS would limit the ability of governments to legislate in certain areas, westminster mall such as worker westminster mall safety, westminster mall environmental or consumer protection. "The ACS is part of this new wave inquietante trade and investment agreements, based on legally binding powers that institutionalize the rights of investors westminster mall and prohibit any state intervention in a wide range of sectors indirectly related to trade" describes the international organization in a detailed report.
Several aspects of the agreement are strongly criticized by trade unions and non-governmental organizations. First, any sector that is not explicitly excluded, protected by each country could be affected by the agreement. With all the dangers that entails. These agreements would open the door to such an influx of private westminster mall enterprises in the European education sector, warning the international federation of teachers' unions. A standstill clause would freeze current levels of liberalization of services in each country, making it impossible to remunicipalisation services eg water, or complicating the creation or restoration of public monopolies in areas currently open to competition [ 4]. Another principle: "clause ratchet effect" (sic), which would freeze any future liberalization of a specific westminster mall service. Part of the unemployment westminster mall insurance is privatized, as in the United westminster mall Kingdom? Retirement is dismantled in favor of pension funds? westminster mall Unable to go back &

No comments:

Post a Comment