I think Sotto was ill-advised. He should kick-out his lawyer(s). I believe littlwoods plagiarism is

“Mula sa blogs, Facebook, at Twitter, ginawa akong sentro ng mga mapanira at malisyosong atake ng iba t ibang tao, lalo pa ng mga sumusuporta sa RH Bill. Bahagi siguro ito ng kanilang istratehiya, lalo pa t may milyun-milyon silang pondo.” littlwoods
Bullying is when you pick on someone for no such logical reason. Its different from asking for accountability and scutiny is not bullying. Sotto is a public official and he should be accountable and face what he said is inaccurate.
It’s cyber justice. Plagiarism may not be a crime but a moral and ethical offense. Just the same, it says a lot about the person who committed littlwoods it. No, he may not be a criminal for plagiarizing, but he is dishonest and a thief. The offense is further compounded by the fact that he first denied it, then when he admitted he lifted littlwoods passages from blogs, he made excuses for it. A senator who cannot even admit something he did (with clear evidence), cannot be trusted. That’s the idea. I won’t call him a criminal for plagiarizing. I’d littlwoods call him dishonest. I don’t want a criminal for a senator, nor do I want a dishonest one.
Senator Sotto: You were EXPOSED AND CONTRADICTED on your lies and obvious plagiarism. littlwoods You initiated the dialogue by making false claims and non original statements by delivering your senate speech. Internet is the modern medium to expose charlatans lie you. In bullying, the victim is always silent, unmindful of others. You were far from that status.
Senator Sotto: you were ridiculed because you claimed you did not plagiarize littlwoods Sarah Pope. Adding insult to injury you were the first Senator to malign bloggers by telling them why should you quote bloggers, they are just bloggers . Now you are expunging your plagiarized statement of the blogger on her Dr McBride quote because you know you are guilty due to the fact that your staff did not read McBride s book. Worst, you did not either and spoke about it.
Senator Sotto: you and your staff are the scumbags of senate by denying the issue of plagiarism, defending your cause despite the position you were alone in your stand. Claiming that everybody in the senate copies the words of unpassed bills of other senators is pathetic excuse. Stealing in whatever form is wrong. Because every Philippine senator is stealing from each other does not make stealing right because you are senators. You maligned your entire colleagues. Some may not be guilty as you are.
Sabi in Sotto: ang mahalaga littlwoods ay ang pinaglalaban littlwoods ko Sen Sotto: Kung mahalaga ang pinaglalaban mo, bakit kailangan pang idahilan at isama ang pagkamatay ng anak sa inyong adhikain. Kasinungalingan naman ang inyong dahilan dahil walang pruweba na ang sakit sa puso dala ng paginom ng contraceptive pills ang nagdalot as sakit ng anak. Saka nagsinungaling ka dun as ngalan ng gamot na Diane ba ininom in Helen dahil hindi pa ginawa ang gamot noong taon 1975 kung kailan pinanganak ang inyong anak.
If Sotto pointed out that there is no law against plagiarism in our country, then the Senate should push for one. We don t want the Philippines known for its Boracay and people who plagiarized, right?
IF THE Senator was as good as defining “plagiarism” from dictionaries with their respective meanings in his previous “turno en contra” speeches, plagiarism would have been a non issue. He should have learned his lesson that he made the Senate chamber a sit-com of sorts for his lack of literacy in public speaking supposedly befitting a Senator. It turned out to be unproductive for him.
The half-wit Senator also thinks that all media or social media opinion commenters not supportive of his stance are paid and low-lifes. He accused the RH proponents as well funded? I wonder if he bothered to check if the Anti-RH bill side is not using money?
Senator Sotto: Tama ka naman hindi pinakingang mabuti ng mga critics mo ang speech mo about sa RH Bill, however, BINASA ito, ININTINDI, INALISA, kaya nakita kung paano mo ginamit ang opinion ng iba with matching iyak pa.
Senator Sotto: Hindi layunin ng mga critics mo na pahinain ang stand mo against RH Bill ikaw ang gumawa ng katawa-tawa kaya ka pinupuna at pinupulaan ngayon. Hindi rin layunin ng mga kritiko mo na ilihis ang issue from RH Bill to Plagiarism, ikaw ang dahilan kung bakit hindi ang stand mo sa RH Bill ang nagiging issue kung hindi ang pangongopya mo. Kaya wag mong sabihin na target ka lang ng hatchet job or demolition job.
I think Sotto was ill-advised. He should kick-out his lawyer(s). I believe littlwoods plagiarism is within the context of IPP law. It is an intellectual property right and his lawyer should know this. But you know them, they can circumvent and find loopholes in the law advantageous to their own malicious bidding.
Pakisabi kay Tito Sotto na OK din to just shut up. KSP! Ok lang kung anti RH sya, opinion niya yun choice niya yun. Nakakawalang kredibilidad yung plagiarism