Then there was the solution to the French Open move elsewhere in r

The An International Policy Africa North America Latin America Asia Belgium Canada Europe Middle East Oceania Switzerland Economy Agriculture and stock investments General Economics International Economics and Management Company Taxation Housing & Real Estate Commodities and energy Media Money and Finance Retirement Work & Employment Company Law and Justice School & Education Environment Public Service liberticidal & Co Nation and Immigration Police and armed Religion Social Sports Society issues Unionism Transport Science and Technology Health Science Technology Culture Cinema Events History Quotes Reading Philosophy
If we were in the first case, then there would be listening to the residents, not to mention the Parisian taxpayers, but we are in the second case, where projects both costly and rejected windows store by the population continue, without us our say. The construction site of Les Halles, its nuisance and cost overruns? No problem! And while one of the key functions of Les Halles RER train station, will be hardly affected, contrary to what was proposed by the Dutch architect Winy Maas, MVRDV's office. The Philharmonic and its non respected budget? Not important either, the taxpayers will pay! But in the case of Roland Garros, the financial scandal doubles as a denial of local democracy.
The mayor of Paris announced Wednesday that a favorable opinion on the renovation and extension project of the Roland Garros site was made by the investigating commissioner of the public inquiry. And "building a new short half-buried 5 000 seats instead of part of the Auteuil garden greenhouses will not, according to the investigating commissioner Marie-Claire Eustache," impact the scheduling of the garden windows store French-registrants historic greenhouses Formigé "and" warm greenhouses and technical "it will replace only had a" support function "against major greenhouses. "
What is the fundamental problem of the French Open? It is primarily the lack of space. Anyone who has visited the stadium at Roland Garros in the first week of the fortnight of May did find that if the site had an undeniable retro charm, visitor traffic was made difficult by the number of people present. Yet even after the work that will result in destruction of part of the Serres d'Auteuil, windows store Roland windows store Garros will remain too small compared to its competitors.
On the other hand, Roland Garros is also a financial problem (opportunity cost) for Parisian taxpayers. The FFT is not stupid. It found that the City of Paris was desperate to keep the Roland windows store Garros French Open .... So she negotiated knowingly. This has given the fact that, as highlighted in a report by the General Inspection Service of the City of Paris, the level of the fee paid by the FTT is "clearly abnormally low". For large concessions, the city of Paris retained a royalty equal to 15% of revenues excluding taxes. The audit noted that the fee paid by the FFT to Roland Garros represents only 1.24% of turnover on the site.
In other words, because the city of Paris is unable to think outside the framework, we will accept the fact that the students of the district of Auteuil, walkers and amateur botanists are deprived windows store of valuable space, all for that for 15 days a year, a sports tournament to take place, despite the clearly stated opposition of local residents against the consensus UMP - PS Delanoe - Hidalgo - Goasguen (well, Goasguen, it is not known exactly).
Here again, as in the case of the Triangle Tower, Anne Hidalgo has a majority problem. Parisian environmentalists are against the French Open extension to the detriment of Serres d'Auteuil and the elected representatives of the modem that have chosen to work with the Socialist majority.
There was first the solution of the coverage of the A13, proposed for years, including the Modem. The open space could be used to expand the tournament without encroaching nor the Serres d'Auteuil, nor the Bois de Boulogne. Bertrand Delanoe and Anne Hidalgo did not want, probably because the cost of the operation would have involved the act of handing over to the private sector entirely.
Then there was the solution to the French Open move elsewhere in r